In February 2026, the Base lending protocol Moonwell lost approximately $1.78 million when a newly-listed market's price feed had a decimals mismatch, mis-valuing the collateral and letting an attacker borrow out the market against an inflated valuation.
What happened
A new Moonwell market used an oracle whose decimal scaling did not match the protocol's assumption (the Vee Finance / Aevo decimals-mismatch class). The mis-scaled price over-valued collateral; the attacker borrowed the market dry.
Aftermath
- Market paused; partial recovery; Moonwell core unaffected.
Why it matters
Moonwell is a 2026 restatement of the decimals-mismatch on new-market listing failure. It pairs with the catalogue's other recurring new-listing hazards (donation attacks, manipulable oracles) under one meta-lesson: listing a new collateral asset is one of the highest-risk operations a lending protocol performs, because it introduces a fresh price-feed integration that bypasses all the scrutiny the existing markets accumulated. The defensive answer is process, not code: a hardened, checklist-enforced, independently-reviewed listing pipeline — exactly what Ionic Money lacked when it listed a fake LBTC.
Sources & on-chain evidence
- [01]halborn.comhttps://www.halborn.com/blog/post/explained-the-moonwell-incident-february-2026
- [02]rekt.newshttps://rekt.news/moonwell-rekt